According to him, actions such as the injunction of parliamentary decisions act as barriers to the House's effectiveness as a branch of government. “I believe that if you allow Parliament to take this decision, then you can go to court to challenge the decision of Parliament. But to injunct Parliament – I personally think it's the wrong approach to solving problems in Parliament,” he argued.
Mr Mpiani was reacting to the Supreme Court’s recent ruling, which overturned Speaker of Parliament Alban Bagbin’s declaration of the Agona West, Suhum, Amenfi Central, and Fomena seats as vacant, following the MPs' decision to switch their political allegiances.
On Tuesday, 12 November 2024, a seven-member panel of the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Gertrude Sackey Torkonoo, ruled by a 5-2 majority against the Speaker’s interpretation of Article 97 (1) (g) and (h). This ruling reaffirmed the NPP, led by Alexander Afenyo-Markin, as the majority caucus in Parliament.
Speaking to Accra-based Joy FM, Mpiani urged Parliament to focus on building consensus and “should find a way of resolving issues instead of running to court.” In his view, the recent parliamentary impasse could have been avoided if all parties had been willing to engage in constructive discussions.
“I believe Parliament should be able to resolve issues itself. In this particular case, if you go back to Parliament and you don't get a quorum to take decisions, what have you achieved?” he questioned.
Consequently, Mr Mpiani called on the Speaker of Parliament, along with both NPP and NDC MPs, to work closely together to move past the current deadlock. This, he emphasised, is essential to ensure that parliamentary proceedings can resume smoothly, without further interruptions.