Dr Ayinde Olukayode who lectures at the Ekiti State University (EKSU) had been facing trial at Nigeria’s Ado-Ekiti High Court and his case was heard by Justice Adekunle Adeleye.
He was charged with the offence of rape contrary to the provisions of Section 31 (c) of the Child’s Rights Law, Cap C7, Laws of Ekiti State, 2012.
According to pulse.ng, Dr Olukayode was arraigned on March 7, 2022, and he pleaded not guilty to raping the minor in August 2020.
READ ALSO: I’ve been selling clients' sperms for 4 years – Ghanaian mother drops scary secrets (video)
“In his judgment, Adeleye held that the prosecution witnesses had created doubt in the mind of the court with the discrepancies in the evidence.
“The judge said that the prosecution had failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.
“He, therefore, discharged and acquitted Olukayode of the offence of rape for insufficient claims,” the news website reports.
Details of the case as reported by pulse.ng:
The prosecution called four witnesses and tendered four exhibits, while the defendant called five witnesses.
The prosecution, claimed that the defendant allegedly had carnal knowledge of the victim several times.
The medical doctor that examined the victim confirmed that her hymen was broken, affirming that there was a minute fresh injury on the girl’s external genitalia without discharge.
The victim said that in June 2021, a group led by the Ekiti State Attorney-General came to Christ’s Girls School to give a sensitisation lecture where she wrote down the Ministry of Justice’s helpline dictated to the students by the Attorney-General.
She said she confided in a man who has a shop next to his guardian because he wanted to borrow his phone to call the MOJ helpline.
Rather, this man helped her inform one of her teachers who later briefed the Principal and in turn contacted the Ekiti State Sexual Referral Centre.
The father of the victim, Olatunji Ojo, who testified on Oath, as a defence witness, told the court that Olukayode did not rape his child because the man is a father to all.
However, Olukayode, in his defence, claimed that he was battling with erection dysfunction, which medically could not position him to have any sexual intercourse.
The defendant’s wife, Eunice Olabisi, also testified that her husband could not have sex with her, in spite of romances for the past five years due to erectile dysfunction, and therefore, could not have committed the offence.
Counsel to the defendant, Mr Oladele Adedeji, submitted that evidence led by the prosecution through the witnesses did not link the defendant with the commission of the offence levelled against him.
Adedeji noted that a medical examination ought to have been conducted when the matter was fresh to show how the hymen of the girl was broken.
He urged the court to discountenance the evidence led by the prosecution since she had failed to establish the ingredients of the offence of rape beyond reasonable doubt.
The counsel prayed the court to discharge and acquit his client for lack of evidence and affirm his innocence.
The prosecution led by a Counsel from the State Ministry of Justice, Ibironke Odetola, submitted that the prosecution had proven the guilty of the defendant beyond reasonable doubt, through the witnesses and prayed the court to convict the defendant as charged.