Fraud Oguaa Omanhen in trouble; Court orders his name deleted from register of chiefs

The High Court, therefore ordered the National House of Chiefs to delete his name from the chieftaincy register

  • Published:
Paramount Chief of the Oguaa Traditional Area, Osaberima Kwesi Atta II play

Paramount Chief of the Oguaa Traditional Area, Osaberima Kwesi Atta II

24/7 Live - Subscribe to the Pulse Newsletter!

The Cape Coast High Court Wednesday ordered that the name of the Paramount Chief of the Oguaa Traditional Area, Osaberima Kwesi Atta II, should be struck out from the register of the National House of Chiefs.

The plaintiffs, Opanyin Kofi Amonoo and four others, prayed the court to set aside the registration of the chief’s name, known in private life as J.S. Haizel, from the National Register of Chiefs as the Omanhen of Oguaa on grounds of fraud.

In his ruling, the Central Regional Supervising High Court judge and Appeal Court judge, Justice G. S. Suurbareh, ruled in favour of the plaintiffs and declared that the registration was fraudulently entered into the register of the National House of Chiefs.

Members of the Royal Family of Eberadze in Cape Coast filed a petition at the Central Regional House of Chiefs in 1998 against the nomination, election and enstoolment of Osaberima Kwesi Atta as the Paramount Chief of the Oguaa Traditional Area.

Fraud

In the relief that they sought, the plaintiffs explained that the chieftaincy declaration form sent to the Central Regional House of Chiefs and subsequently through to the National House of Chiefs for the registration of Osaberima Kwesi Atta as Omanhen had inaccuracies in the answers to some of the questions asked on the form.

The plaintiffs had earlier told the court that in a section of the chieftaincy declaration form that asked whether there was a petition pending against the installation, the answer provided was ‘no’, when, indeed, a case challenging the enstoolment of Osaberima Kwesi Atta was pending at the Central Regional House of Chiefs.

Additionally, in an answer to the question whether the chief was in possession of the Black Stool, the answer was ‘yes’, when a letter had been written to the plaintiffs’ head of family demanding the Black Stool.

The High Court, therefore ordered the National House of Chiefs to delete his name from the chieftaincy register.

Source: Graphiconline

Recommended Articles

Recommended Videos





Top Articles

1 Corrupt Officers Customs officials dismissed for alleged corruptionbullet
2 Galamsey Queen Angry Aisha Huang denied bail againbullet
3 Secret Recording Immigration boss hot over Aisha Huang's leaked tapebullet
4 Illegal Mining Galamsey thrived under Mahama – Prof. Marteybullet
5 Mahamudu Bawumia Vice President's convoy involved in an accidentbullet
6 Newspaper review Today's Front Pages [May 22, 2017]bullet
7 Galamsey In Ghana Soldiers offering protection for illegal...bullet
8 Galamsey Russian, Ukrainian galamsey operators arrestedbullet
9 Bombing Manchester attack: Online reactionsbullet
10 Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo Ghana's president condemns...bullet

Top Videos

1 Watch Stop taking collection in churches -TB Joshua to Pastorsbullet
2 Video Edward Gyampana is the teenage design genius who needs your helpbullet
3 Meet "The Beast" President Obama's Cadillac that's more tank than carbullet
4 AMERI Power Plant AMERI lacks expertise in power projects – Philip...bullet
5 TRAGEDY Fire guts Coconut Grove Hotelbullet
6 In Zimbabwe President Mugabe’s 70 year-old aide marries his...bullet
7 Night Life Some taxi drivers and their night driving experiencesbullet
8 Woyome Judgement Debt Kweku Baako dances over Amidu's winbullet
9 Vitiligo Enam Honya - is challenging what you think...bullet
10 Video Metro Mass bus catches fire on Cape Coast-Kasoa...bullet

News