Fraud Oguaa Omanhen in trouble; Court orders his name deleted from register of chiefs

The High Court, therefore ordered the National House of Chiefs to delete his name from the chieftaincy register

  • Published:
Paramount Chief of the Oguaa Traditional Area, Osaberima Kwesi Atta II play

Paramount Chief of the Oguaa Traditional Area, Osaberima Kwesi Atta II

24/7 Live - Subscribe to the Pulse Newsletter!

The Cape Coast High Court Wednesday ordered that the name of the Paramount Chief of the Oguaa Traditional Area, Osaberima Kwesi Atta II, should be struck out from the register of the National House of Chiefs.

The plaintiffs, Opanyin Kofi Amonoo and four others, prayed the court to set aside the registration of the chief’s name, known in private life as J.S. Haizel, from the National Register of Chiefs as the Omanhen of Oguaa on grounds of fraud.

In his ruling, the Central Regional Supervising High Court judge and Appeal Court judge, Justice G. S. Suurbareh, ruled in favour of the plaintiffs and declared that the registration was fraudulently entered into the register of the National House of Chiefs.

Members of the Royal Family of Eberadze in Cape Coast filed a petition at the Central Regional House of Chiefs in 1998 against the nomination, election and enstoolment of Osaberima Kwesi Atta as the Paramount Chief of the Oguaa Traditional Area.

Fraud

In the relief that they sought, the plaintiffs explained that the chieftaincy declaration form sent to the Central Regional House of Chiefs and subsequently through to the National House of Chiefs for the registration of Osaberima Kwesi Atta as Omanhen had inaccuracies in the answers to some of the questions asked on the form.

The plaintiffs had earlier told the court that in a section of the chieftaincy declaration form that asked whether there was a petition pending against the installation, the answer provided was ‘no’, when, indeed, a case challenging the enstoolment of Osaberima Kwesi Atta was pending at the Central Regional House of Chiefs.

Additionally, in an answer to the question whether the chief was in possession of the Black Stool, the answer was ‘yes’, when a letter had been written to the plaintiffs’ head of family demanding the Black Stool.

The High Court, therefore ordered the National House of Chiefs to delete his name from the chieftaincy register.

Source: Graphiconline

Recommended Articles

Recommended Videos





Top Articles

1 VIDEO & PHOTOS Fire guts Dr. Nduom's Coconut Groove Regency Hotelbullet
2 Regency Hotel fire outbreak Fire Service brought empty fire tenders to...bullet
3 Dud Cheques Ibrahim Mahama ordered by EOCO to pay state GHC12.7 millionbullet
4 Conflict 17 year-old killed in Nkonya, Alavanyo clashesbullet
5 Security Ghana Armed Forces resumes 2017 recruitment exercisebullet
6 Dud Cheques Sam George claims government owes Ibrahim Mahama...bullet
7 Labour Unrest Labour Minister calls for dialogue with JUSSAG...bullet
8 Accountability PAC to consider four reports on first...bullet
9 Fire Outbreak We didn't send empty fire tenders to...bullet
10 Boozing Galore Scores of drunken youth pass out at...bullet

Top Videos

1 TRAGEDY Fire guts Coconut Grove Hotelbullet
2 Watch Stop taking collection in churches -TB Joshua to Pastorsbullet
3 Ghana@60 Agya Koo embarrassed Ghana at Independence Day - Asiedu Nketiabullet
4 Nigerians stop deportation of chained compatriot in KLM flightbullet
5 In Zimbabwe President Mugabe’s 70 year-old aide marries his...bullet
6 Twitter Reacts Pepsi faces backlash over silly advertbullet
7 Woyome Judgement Debt Kweku Baako dances over Amidu's winbullet
8 Video Metro Mass bus catches fire on Cape Coast-Kasoa highwaybullet
9 Vitiligo Enam Honya - is challenging what you think...bullet
10 Ghana Prison Interior Minister inspects prison...bullet

News